Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is better than the LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Samsung Galaxy S22's body is notably newer, but a little thicker and just a bit heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S22, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S22 has a better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch and a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a little longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.