Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, with a 93.4 score against 87.6. The Galaxy S22 body is newer, somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than LG V60 ThinQ. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version, so it provides a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S22 features a lot better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount in each inch of display. The LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a worse 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.