Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's score of 87.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG Velvet. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S22 has a way better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy S22 features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot higher video resolution and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Velvet. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG Velvet, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.