Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite's 87.1 general score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, giving lots of additional features. The Galaxy S22 is a just a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, even when both were only released 6 months apart.
Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.