Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Edge 40, having a general score of 93.4 against 77.2. The Galaxy S22 has the same thickness and weight than Motorola Edge 40. Both of these phones use the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so they should offer identical operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a better looking display than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more brightness and a little bit greater pixels density. The Motorola Edge 40's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Galaxy S22's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The Galaxy S22 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments and a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have a back facing camera with a 50 MP resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.