Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's score of 77. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 13 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, even though it was released around a year before.
Galaxy S22 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little bit brighter display.
The Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Galaxy S22 count with incredibly similar memory to install applications and games, they have the same 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.