Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a 93.4 score against 83.4. Even though Galaxy S22 is older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices use the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so they should offer identical OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a brighter display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and a back camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has better video frame rates and a larger sensor.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.