Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a score of 93.4 against 81.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is an noticeably older phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy S22 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S22, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution, a just a bit greater display pixel density and much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.