Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 score. The Galaxy S22 is an a lot older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much more opaque display, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S22 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy S22 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.