Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 global score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also way thinner and much lighter than Moto G 5G.
The Galaxy S22 has a much better screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S22 features a bit better processor than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with more MP and a lot higher video resolution. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.