Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a score of 93.4 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G 5G Plus. Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S22 has a bit superior processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a back facing camera with more MP.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.