Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Moto G Power, having a 93.4 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it is also way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Power. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Moto G Power has Android 11.
The Galaxy S22 features a way better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G Power counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way higher video definition and a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G Power counts with improved battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.