Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Moto G Power (2021), with a 93.4 score against 76.5. The Galaxy S22 design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Power (2021). The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better screen than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot higher number of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Power (2021) counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.