Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than Moto G Stylus (2021), with a 93.4 score against 79.3. Galaxy S22's design is newer, notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021). The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Galaxy S22 has just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.