Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-06-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), having a overall score of 93.4 against 82.1. The Galaxy S22 is a somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), even when both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S22 features a bit faster processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better video quality and a more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.