Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than Moto G100's 88.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy S22's body is newer, much thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G100. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Moto G100 has Android 11, providing the user some additional features and optimized performance.
Moto G100 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G100, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
The Galaxy S22 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a back camera with way less MP resolution and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Moto G100 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G100 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G100 features greater battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.