Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Moto G200 5G, having a 93.4 score against 86.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy S22 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G200 5G, although they were released with only 3 months difference.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S22. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cores. Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display density.
Galaxy S22 takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 50 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much better video quality. Moto G200 5G's memory for games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S22's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G200 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.