Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-12-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than the Moto G31's 77 overall score. The Galaxy S22 design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G31, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Moto G31 has Android 11.
Galaxy S22 has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. Moto G31 features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy S22 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G31 features greater battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 features a much better camera than Moto G31, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.