Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto G60s's 79.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Moto G60s has Android 11 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than Moto G60s.
Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each inch of screen. Moto G60s has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G60s also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S22 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Moto G60s features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 takes better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.