Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Moto G71 5G, with a 93.4 score against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G71 5G, although both of them were released only a few months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. Moto G71 5G and Galaxy S22 both feature really similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy S22 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G71 5G counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 features a better camera than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a 50 megapixels camera in the back and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.