Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is way better than Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy S22's body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Play.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display density and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Moto G9 Play features improved battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.