Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-02-25 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Moto Z Force, getting a 93.4 score against 75.8. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Galaxy S22's body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than Moto Z Force.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit worse pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a much higher resolution camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.