Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 93.4 against 77.4. The Galaxy S22 design is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy S22 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a brighter display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S22 is also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.