Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a 93.4 score against 77.4. Although Galaxy S22 is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's heavier and much thicker. The Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger display.
Moto Z2 Play has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 features a little bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.