Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the Moto Z3, getting a overall score of 93.4 against 77.6. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is much newer than the Moto Z3, it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper display than Moto Z3, because it has a little larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto Z3 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a much better video resolution, a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much better 50 MP resolution camera.
Galaxy S22 features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more money than Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.