Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a 93.4 score against 79.8. Galaxy S22 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Hyper. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, so it counts with lots of additional features and better performance.
Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos. The Motorola One Hyper has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.