Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 15 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 422 pixels per inch | -- |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version.
The Galaxy S22 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen and a lot darker screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lower video frame rates, they both have a back camera with a 50 megapixels resolution, the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.