Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a general score of 93.4 against 75.8. Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also much lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has an incredibly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit better display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with faster video frame rate, a better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S22 costs more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.