Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a 93.4 score against 76.2. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version. Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also notably lighter and extremely thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S.
The Galaxy S22 features a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a really brighter display and a little bit greater display density. Nubia Red Magic 5S features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy S22, they have equal 128 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a camera with a lot lower resolution and a worse video definition, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 22 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 is more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.