Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's general score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy S22 features a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and more display brightness. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a camera in the back with a 50 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a lot better video resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S22 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.