Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Galaxy S22's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit greater pixel number in each inch of display and a way brighter display. Galaxy A16 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have a 50 MP back-facing camera and a same size camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.