Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. The Galaxy S22 body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released just a little further than a year before. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a brighter screen and a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy S22 has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a lot higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.