Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the Galaxy A31, having a global score of 93.4 against 81.3. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10, counting with some extra features and some performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A31.
Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot better video definition, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.