Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Galaxy S22's design is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little higher pixel density and much more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S22's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a way better video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.