Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, getting a general score of 93.4 against 81.7. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A41's, although it's also a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, although it has a just a bit lower display density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos, a lot higher video quality, a back camera with more MP and a lot larger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.