Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than Galaxy A50's score of 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a a bit heavier device than Galaxy A50, but both have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A50 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better resolution back camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A50, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.