Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G's score of 91.3. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A52 5G. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, providing you some nice extra features.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S22 captures a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.