Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-11-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s global score of 85.2. Galaxy S22's construction is incredibly newer, a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A9 (2018). Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot more megapixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.