Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S22's 93.4 global score. Galaxy Fold is a older and a lot heavier phone than Galaxy S22, but Samsung managed to make it a little thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S22 has Android 13.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S22, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S22. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy S22, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.