Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Max, getting a 93.4 score against 76.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy S22 construction is much newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy J7 Max.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.