Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Galaxy M30, having a global score of 93.4 against 82.4. The Galaxy S22 construction is a lot newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy M30. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has older 13 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S22 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a much better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments and a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy M30 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.