Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-06-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy M40's global score of 85. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy M40.
Galaxy S22 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.