Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 20's global score of 90.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy Note 20. Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's storage for games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S22's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy S22 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video definition and the same 24 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S22 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.