Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than Galaxy Note 5, with a 93.4 score against 79.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a just a little bit lighter device than the Galaxy Note 5, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, giving a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy S22 features a better processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S22 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a much higher video quality and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy S22 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 costs a lot more money than Galaxy Note 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.