Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a 93.4 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a a bit thinner phone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both of them have the same weight. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S22 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy S22 features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S22 costs more than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.