Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's general score of 86.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is notably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S22 features a way better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much more MP camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features greater battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.