Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S10 Lite, with a 93.4 score against 89.7. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy S10 Lite. Galaxy S22 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a lot better video quality, a back facing camera with more mega pixels, a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S10 Lite. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S10 Lite, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.