Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, with a overall score of 93.4 against 77.8. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, although it's also just a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S22 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S22 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations, a much more MP back camera, a lot better video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.