Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is better than Galaxy XCover 5's global score of 78.1. The Galaxy S22 body is newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover 5. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11, so it counts with some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher pixel density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display. Galaxy S22 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy S22 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 23% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.