Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 422 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a general score of 93.4 against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S22 has a lot better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch of display. Galaxy S22 features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.